Rick Santorum:

Ann Coulter:

Phyllis Schlafly


Here’s to seeing who gets to beat Obummer!

Here’s an excerpt:

A New York City subway train holds 1,200 people. This blog was viewed about 6,100 times in 2011. If it were a NYC subway train, it would take about 5 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Mothers picking up their children

This would mean that, they’re afraid that the state might enforce the law? Wow..

However, an anonymous school worker, because she wasn’t a  authorized spokeswoman, in Albertville tried to make a sob story for the media. She says that a large amount of Latino people “many families might leave town over the weekend”. However, the thing that I noticed was that she said that they were leaving “for other states”. They’re not going to their home country, but other states? This is interesting to me. They decide just to change states. hmmm.

This is the sob story part. She also said “I met a Hispanic mother in the hallway at our community learning center this morning, where enrollment and withdrawal happens. She looked at me with tears in her eyes. I asked, ‘Are you leaving?’ She said ‘Yes,’ and hugged me, crying.”

I am sorry. I don’t really wish to say you can’t be here, but that’s why its called ILegal immigration. So, you can’t be here. I invite you to become a citizen!

Shockingly enough, “The Obama administration filed court documents Friday announcing its plans to appeal the ruling that upheld the law.”

This was said to Bristol Palin at Saddle Ranch bar in West Hollywood. Ms. Palin had just fallen off of a mechanical bull, and a 47 year old bystander yelled, “Did you ride Levi like that? Your mother is a whore! Your mother is the f***ing devil.”

Bristol then came over and asked the man, “What did she do?” The man can come up with nothing much besides “She’s evil”. She also recognized the man is a homosexual, and ask him if this was why he hated Sarah. You’d think he would try to use it to his advantage. However, he continues to just say Sarah Palin is “evil” and “polluting the world”.

However around the 2:50 minute mark, he elaborates on the evil remark. He says “She lies” and “She can’t speak English”.

Later after Bristol tells him that he has no facts and walks away, He brilliantly comes back with, “You’re f***ing white trash from Wasilla”.  He followed with  “F*** you you f***ing bitch!” Bristol then left.

This would be a lovely example of liberal stupidity. Let’s accuse someone of something, and have absolutely no facts to back it up.  I belive Ms. Palin did exactly what she should. You elaborated on it, and then left. Good job Bristol.

WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS EXPLICIT LANGUAGE:

I found this via Dairy of a Mad Conservative

“You have a lot of kids graduating college, [who] can’t find jobs,” said Bloomberg, during his weekly radio show on Friday. “That’s what happened in Cairo. That’s what happened in Madrid. You don’t want those kinds of riots here.”

It makes me think about the recent Wall Street protests. Allow me to explain:

In an article in the New York Times, it tells about protests in Wall Street. The theme is being called Occupy Wall Street. It started on a social networking site, and on Twitter it is being shared by using the hashtag #Occupywallstreet.

The claimed the idea came from:

The idea, according to some organizers, was to camp out for weeks or even months to replicate the kind, if not the scale, of protests that erupted earlier this year in places as varied as Egypt, Spain and Israel.

A 68-year-old man living in Forest Hills, Queens,  Bill Steyert, told a reporter, “You need a scorecard to keep track of all the things that corporations have done that are bad for this country.”

I love people like this. I mean, where are the facts? They just blatantly blame corporations for everything. Later, I’ll prove why they’re wrong, but yet again, they claim that:

Nearby, Micah Chamberlain, 23, a line cook from Columbus, Ohio, held up a sign reading “End the Oligarchy” and said he had hitchhiked to New York. “There are millions of people in this county without jobs,” he said. “And 1 percent of the people have 99 percent of the money.”

They  waved signs like:

 “Democracy Not Corporatization” or “Revoke Corporate Personhood.”

And “As some of the patrons laughed and raised drinks” the protestors chanted “pay your share.”

Yet in another article, the protestors say:

“Wall Street is certainly the heart of why we’re here. It’s the corporations — the big banks in this country have been destroying this country,” said Fithian. “Overfees or high mortgages, student loans, the banks are touching every aspect of our lives.”

She added that banks and the wealthy have taken money for their own interests and their own survival.

Yes, we know that you can recite bumper stickers, but do you have any facts, no.

Now, I can show you my response. Here is the first wrong:

Nearby, Micah Chamberlain, 23, a line cook from Columbus, Ohio, held up a sign reading “End the Oligarchy” and said he had hitchhiked to New York. “There are millions of people in this county without jobs,” he said. “And 1 percent of the people have 99 percent of the money.”

I invite you to watch this video. It was made by a professor at Harvard:

He points out that the myth that Capitalism creates an unfair distribution of wealth (which is what these protestors are protesting. Capitalism rewards those who are productive. He also talks about how government cannot over regulate business because it hurts the economy.  Lastly, the professor shows that interfering with Capitalism causes crisises.

“Wall Street is certainly the heart of why we’re here. It’s the corporations — the big banks in this country have been destroying this country,” said Fithian. “Overfees or high mortgages, student loans, the banks are touching every aspect of our lives.”

They yet again show no data at all. Congratulations, you can recite car bumper stickers.

Lastly, I respond to the “pay your share” chanted by the protestors.  I invite you to read this article:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/top_50__of_wage_earners_pay_96_09__of_income_taxes.guest.html

Here is a chart from this article:

So before you say anything about your “fair share”, look at the facts.

https://twitter.com/#!/sunshineejc/status/112948060170100736

It is from@sunshineejc, and it says:

“Top 1% take home 23% Total National INCOME causing Middle Class to have no buying power b/c INEQUALITY OF INCOME”~SECY REICH~#p2 #p21#tlot“

I had just read my daily email from Human Events called “365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy by James Delingpole”. Today it said:

The idea of liberal “fairness” has always baffled me. They continuously talk about how we need to be a fair nation, and have fair wages, fair work, fair this and fair that. However their idea of fairness for tax rates is insane. They continually say we need to tax the rich. It’s basically their slogan. It can even be seen in a video by Van Jone’s Rebuild the Dream. At the 0:48 second mark, they say

Return to fairer tax rates. If the rich don’t pay their taxes, we’ll have to! So, end the bush tax cuts for the rich, and add new tax brackets for people making more than 1 million dollars.

Though the video was a bit of a non sequitur, it proves that Democrats want to tax the rich. I don’t know why they think taxing the people who create jobs is a good idea, but they do. All Democrats do is say, “tax the rich”. However, take a look at the “Ways to Annoy a Liberal” that I got this morning:

The top five percent of Americans pay for 60 percent of government’s revenue, and the top ten percent pays 75% of government revenue. So, only 2/5ths make up the rest. So essentially, Van Jones wishes for the rich to pay all of the taxes. Does anyone else think that having the top 5% pay for everything is insane??? I mean, they create the jobs. This is yet another example of the left’s insanity.

As you can see, half of the U.S. population doesn’t pay taxes. Now, it starts to make sense why so many people like Barack Obama. There not paying any taxes! In fact, the 2012 election might be the first election where non-taxpaying voters outnumber taxpaying voters. How, as a liberal, can you say you stand for fairness when half of your population doesn’t pay taxes? You can’t liberals are just hypocrites, and they’ll never change.

In conclusion, @sunshineejc talked about the top 1% taking home 23% Total National income. Here is a shocker; if you pay more into something, you get more out. It’s not exactly a hard concept, but Democrats will never get it. Today, please try to talk some sense into a liberal….if you can.

A church remembers 9/11 http://t.co/PHV9xKX—
The Bader Nation (@TheBaderNation) September 09, 2011

Are Deficits Unpatriotic?

Barack Obama used to think so.

by  John Hayward

08/25/2011

On the day before Independence Day 2008, Senator Barack Obama delivered this opinion of deficit spending at a campaign event:

The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents.  Number 43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.

Emphasis mine.)  President Obama has now added $4 trillion all by his lonesome… in less than half the time it took “Number 43.”  Does he still think deficits are “unpatriotic,” or is that the wrong word?

It’s ironic isn’t it? Barack Obama talking about this a day before July 4th! Anyway, Obama further demonstrates his hypocrisy; His ability to blame almost anyone else if the situation went wrong, and he takes credit when anything goes well. For example, if the number of jobless people goes up or if Barack Obama spends “$4 trillion by his lonesome”, it’s not his fault. It’s all just Bush’s fault. Or, it’s the GOP’s fault, or the Tea Party, or Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, or China. It’s never the Obama administration’s fault. That’s what they do. They also take credit for anything good.  They don’t just let it be. They have to publicize all their good deeds. Did anyone else notice how many times Obama said “I” in his speech when SEALs killed Osama Bin Laden? The Obama administration has to take credit for EVERYTHING. If the Hurricane threatening the eastern seaboard vanished,  Barack Obama would claim he did it.

However, Obama is being a hypocrite. He accuses President Bush of being irresponsible and unpatriotic, but he’s doing what what he accused Bush of doing: spending, spending, spending. While President Bush wasn’t my favorite president, he was and always will be a better one than Barack Obama.

However, Mr. Hayward continues and I like what he has to say:

Deficit spending is tyrannical.  It’s the ultimate form of taxation without representation, presenting children not yet born with bills they never had a chance to vote against.  It establishes programs that become permanent financial obligations for future Congresses.  When the people demand fiscal restraint from big-spending government, they’re told spending cuts are effectively impossible, because too many citizens depend on the deficit-financed programs, and too many government employees would lose their jobs.Deficit spending is a lie.  The people are offered subsidies and benefits paid for with money that doesn’t exist.  When politicians speak of trillion-dollar “stimulus” programs, they’re distorting the free market with false information, and wielding economic influence they don’t really have.  Government attempts to create new markets out of thin air using deficit money, such as the “green jobs” disaster, amount to weaving a mirage with illusionary thread.

Our massive national debt, built through decades of deficit spending, makes America weak.  Increasing individual and corporate dependency on a rapidly growing government drains the vitality of the free market.  Unfriendly creditor nations like China gain unhealthy amounts of economic leverage over us.  Credit agencies like Standard & Poor’s become major players in public policy debates.

Hayward claims deficit spending is tyrannical, a lie, and makes America weak, and I think he’s right. I’m not sure how to say it any better. It is tyrannical. It makes people in Washington decide how to spend my money and money that doesn’t exist, and it’s a lie. Government’s don’t create jobs, people do. Finally, it does make America weak. Government running the US is not good for us.

Next, to wrap up, Mr. Hayward talks about the debt and it’s effect on America:

Very soon, we will feel the consequences from years of deficit spending, as unsustainable entitlement programs collapse… and the resulting social chaos will destroy us.  The day quickly approaches when Washington can’t borrow or print enough money to pretend it can function.  The last generation that might avoid the crash has come dangerously close to accepting sugary lies, peddled by those who seek political benefit from riding the dying system for a little longer.  When their illusions fail, there will be nowhere to register a complaint, and very little to discuss.

He paints a dark picture, but not only does that work in creating action, but sadly, he might very well be right. We need to get a hold of this now before we destroy OURSELVES.

John also leaves us with a nice little tag line that gave me a chuckle:

Does all of that add up to make deficit spending “unpatriotic?”  Barack Obama claimed to think so, four trillion dollars ago.

Our first video is what is supposed to be a “banned commercial” about the Chinese stake in the US debt:

Rather striking, but I like the how far they took it.

————————————

In this video, he shows how much a billion years. It’s so cool. It shows how much a billion seconds, minutes, hours,  and months are.  Keep in mind that our debt is in the TRILLIONs and what you’re about to see is billions:

——————————————-

In this video, he compares our full debt with many other things: including China’s GDP:

———————————————-

Oh lord, another teen thinking his opinion matters. I came across your blog and it’s such a load of idiotic conservative bull crap. I was thinking, “The degree of immaturity and insults towards people with different views on this blog makes me sick and makes me wonder how a grown adult could write these kinds of things”. But then I saw the fact that you were 14, this makes me even sicker. The fact that a young teenager is spending all his time radiating hate towards the left and coming up with misinformed, insulting remarks towards anyone that has different views than him is just terrible. You’re not saying anything intellectual, but instead insulting anyone who is a democrat. A kid is supposed to be crazy during his teen years, more and more studies these days show that it forms a teenagers brain on whats wrong and whats right in the future if in a sense of moderation. If you grow on hate you will never get off it. Stop trying to oust peoples own opinions and replace them with you’re own, it WILL NOT work. Seriously go be a teenager and not some basement dwelling troll. You know basically nothing about how politics work so stop trying to assert yourself as someone who’s opinion matters. I’m not even going to look at this again so don’t even reply, just take in these words and think about the fact that you will have you’re adult life (50+ Years) to do this kind of stuff. Now think of the short years you will have to actually be free and have real fun. You are living those years right now, and you are letting them slip away while doing this crap. Goodbye.

However, Mr “Anonymous” did come back again on ” JibJab Goes Political and More!” http://bit.ly/qoWDpH, and they commented:

Seriously why do you continue to post this crap. All you do is f***ing hate in these things, it’s getting pathetic. No one cares about some teenagers opinion, especially a misguided, spoiled brat’s one. What kind of Parent would give their mentally ill child a computer to do this stuff? Stop thinking you’re opinion matters, it doesn’t, no one cares what you have to say.

First off, am I the only one that thinks if your going to attack someone, you should do it personally? Not just leave it at “Anonymous”. You’re attacking someone’s image and ideals, so be strong enough to put a name down. However, they did enter their email, but I will not release that due to my policies. However, it doesn’t mean it’s okay just to attack me and hide.

Let’s start:

Oh lord, another teen thinking his opinion matters.

Right off the bat, we know that the comment is going to end up mean.

I came across your blog and it’s such a load of idiotic conservative bull crap.

Well, We haven’t seen any facts yet, but maybe he’ll turn something up.

I was thinking, “The degree of immaturity and insults towards people with different views on this blog makes me sick and makes me wonder how a grown adult could write these kinds of things”. But then I saw the fact that you were 14, this makes me even sicker.

No, Mr “Anonymous” gave no specifics. I can say that he didn’t read my site because if he did, he’d learn that I am usually a nice kind debater. However when Van Jones compared us to al-Qaeda, I flipped. How dare you do such a thing? I got really mad. That’s rude and WAY uncalled for. By the way, here’s the article: http://bit.ly/jlUji4.

The next thing he said was that I’m immature. I am sometimes. However, I don’t see how being mad about this is wrong. However, let’s move on.

The fact that a young teenager is spending all his time radiating hate towards the left and coming up with misinformed, insulting remarks towards anyone that has different views than him is just terrible. You’re not saying anything intellectual, but instead insulting anyone who is a democrat.

I do not radiate hate. I give judgment to those who I think deserve it. You also gave no reason why I am misinformed. I also don’t go off on anyone who doesn’t see things the way I see them. In fact, I am friends with many Democrats, and I don’t always agree with them. However, I do try to reason with them. But if you call me a terrorist, that’s not okay. Next:

A kid is supposed to be crazy during his teen years, more and more studies these days show that it forms a teenagers brain on whats wrong and whats right in the future if in a sense of moderation. If you grow on hate you will never get off it.

I’d agree that having fun in my teen years is important, and blogging is not taking up my life. In fact, I’ve been so busy I haven’t blogged in a while. So before you try and, as you love to put it,  “label”  me, you should know me first. Next:

Stop trying to oust peoples own opinions and replace them with you’re own, it WILL NOT work. Seriously go be a teenager and not some basement dwelling troll.

I’m not ousting his opinion. I am trying to make people realize that he’s being insane. The mainstream media misses ANYTHING like this, so it’s conservative  patriots who must bring it to the surface.

Also, I’m not Charlie Sheen, or a basement dwelling troll.  I blog in bursts. Like I said, I haven’t blogged in a while. In fact, this isn’t exactly the article I’d like to come back with, but I wanted to get to you first. Next:

You know basically nothing about how politics work so stop trying to assert yourself as someone who’s opinion matters.

I have a suggestion. First if you don’t like my ideas, don’t read my blog. I’m not forcing you to read it. I am trying to raise the things the mainstream media misses.  Second, I’m not trying to assert myself either. I say what I think. If you don’t like it, that’s a shame.

I’m not even going to look at this again so don’t even reply, just take in these words and think about the fact that you will have you’re adult life (50+ Years) to do this kind of stuff. Now think of the short years you will have to actually be free and have real fun. You are living those years right now, and you are letting them slip away while doing this crap. Goodbye.

Well first, you did respond. So,  you kind of lied. Also, I’ll live my life how I want to love it, but I thank you for your advice.

Now, let’s move onto you’re next comment, http://bit.ly/qoWDpH:

Seriously why do you continue to post this crap. All you do is f***ing hate in these things, it’s getting pathetic. No one cares about some teenagers opinion, especially a misguided, spoiled brat’s one. What kind of Parent would give their mentally ill child a computer to do this stuff? Stop thinking you’re opinion matters, it doesn’t, no one cares what you have to say.

Now to him/her, I’m called a spoiled, misguided brat who hates on everything. I notice that they didn’t point out where I did this hating, nor why I am misguided or spoiled. I also don’t appreciate you insulting my parents. I love my parents, and they’ve done a lot for me. However,  I don’t appreciate you calling them crazy.  I also think that if you want to think that my opinion doesn’t matter, that’s nice. Frankly, I don’t care. I do think that you’re entitled to your opinion, so think what you want.  However, I’m still here, and I’m not going anywhere.

This Land

(A video making fun of Both Bush and Kerry):

Ahnuld for Governor

(Arnold Schwarzenegger for Government Parody):

George Bush’s Second Term

(basically calling bash a hillbilly):

Good to Be in D.C.

(a parody video about politicians in D.C.):

Now, we move into Obama and McCain:

Time for Some Campaignin

(it makes one more joke about Bush, then shows McCain as this war loving old person. Then, shows Barrack Obama frolicking amongst flowers. However, Obama’s appearance is so fake that it is meant to be a joke.):

_______________________________

Now, JibJab made videos reviewing the year:

JibJab.com – 2008 Year In Review

(Only political part is when they say Barrack defeated John McCain. “so long to the far right”)

Never a Year Like ’09 – JibJab

(They referred to Bush and Obama “43 was pushed out the door and 44′s a bit darker than before!”. Also, in reference to the healthcare plan “There’s gonna be a public option, no it’s out, no it’s in!” They talked about Palin quitting.  They talked about “my hero”, Joe Wilson, shouting “you lie!”. JibJab talked about Obama’s Nobel award, but “for what? Nobody was quite sure!”.

So Long To Ya, 2010 | The JibJab 2010 Year in Review!

(This video was mainly political. Obama and Biden are the main characters who show us everything. They state about how both parties had rallies.  “Obama” talks about how he has spent so much, and we don’t have jobs! Obama and Biden also talk about how the Republicans beat Dems in the mid-terms.)

_____________________________________

JibJab also discussed about the poor journalism in our day:

What We Call The News:

They also created a video of a collection of president’s speaking which they smashed together to make:

The Star Spangled Banner:

The image on which Mr. Kowal commented

Regardless, our first comment was on one of the White House’s photos.  Be warned. A mister Larry Kowal said:

” Mr. President, good speech the other day. You need to get tougher on these republicans because they DO NOT CARE about regular people like myself. Your doing a great job, keep it up, fight the good fight! The republicans/conservatives want EVERYTHING from us, they want two classes in the country, rich and poor. Continue to do everything in your power help the middle class. I hope, pray you get elected again in 2012. Good luck and God bless you and your family. P.S.- Thanks for saving us from a depression at the beginning of your term. I’m just reminding the people who say you haven’t done enough what good you have done for your country! “

Wow, how do you get that messed up in the brain? Let’s analyze piece by piece.

” Mr. President, good speech the other day.”

This is your average loving fan.

“You need to get tougher on these republicans because they DO NOT CARE about regular people like myself.”

However, this one gets weird. Mr. Kowal is….well, wrong. Flat out wrong.  First,  I understand it’s just a Facebook post, but at least try to prove why we’re so in the wrong. Try to provide  some evidence. That’s like just shouting racist for no reason. I mean, we’re trying to stabilize the country, repeal obamacare, and bring down the debt. It seems you stop us at every turn. We care for all of the country. Though we are portrayed as these baby loving, Jesus loving, greedy business owners, we’re not.  If I could run the world my way, I’d be some utopian society, but I can’t. So, we’re doing the best we can to help everyone possible,  while still maintaining economic balance. You can’ t just go and print money all day can you? oh…

“Your doing a great job, keep it up, fight the good fight”

How is Barack Obama doing anything, but being one of the worst, if not THE worst president in United States history? If you haven’t noticed we’re in an unconstitutional war, our debt is 14 TRIllion dollars, we passed socialized medicine, he was  taken over several different motor companies, bowed to emperors, and more. My gosh, what else do you need to understand he’s bad. I’m not even convinced he’s eligible even be president. He is doing a horrible job! Also, could you at least get the whole “your vs. you’re” thing right?

“The republicans/conservatives want EVERYTHING from us, they want two classes in the country, rich and poor.”

We want to TAKE everything from you? IF anything we’re the opposite! We are for less government interference in our lives and lower taxes. We want America to grow and prosper, not suck the life out of it. I love my country. We’re not trying to create two classes. In fact, if you knew anything about this country you’d know that their are in fact three classes in America: the wealthy class, the middle class, and the poor class. The idea of this was that the American classes were shaped like a diamond; a small poor and wealthy class and a large middle class. However, that’s not what your saying. Your trying to say that Republicans love the wealthy and will thus create a new wealthy-poor thing? That’s false. I bet you think the rich need to pay more…their fair share? Please watch this and you may want to skip to 0:40 seconds:

“Continue to do everything in your power help the middle class.”

Mr. Obama has done middle for the middle class besides hurting it. However, I’d still love to see how you think he’s “helping” them.

“I hope, pray you get elected again in 2012. Good luck and God bless you and your family.”

Wow! You said God in a post. Gee, and I thought you couldn’t do that. It’s not like you can’t say the pledge of allegiance either!

“P.S.- Thanks for saving us from a depression at the beginning of your term. I’m just reminding the people who say you haven’t done enough what good you have done for your country! “

Due to the fact that the unemployment skyrocketed under Obama means that perhaps your wrong here buddy.  Also, aside from running an excellent campaign, he has done nothing else worth mentioning. I say good riddance to him.
NOBAMA 2012!

‘Booty Call Ninja’ Scheme Leads To Criminal Charges

A man was attacked early Friday by “two people weilding nunchuks and throwing stars” while attempting to meet his ex-girlfriend for a sexual encounter in suburban Joliet, Ill.

According to the Chicago Sun-Times, a 44-year-old man contacted his ex about meeting…and Katherine M. Casarez, 29, told him to meet her in a nearby alley…

By Jim Mone, AP

“as far as socio-political beliefs are concerned, I consider myself a Marxist … But not a Leninist,” he clarified.

A person named Tsering Namgyal was there at the University of Minnesota and wrote about this at Religion Dispatches.

However, one one student asked why his belief in Marxism didn’t clash with the Dalai Lama’s own teaching. The Dalai Lama had this to say:

Marx was not against religion or religious philosophy per se but against religious institutions that were allied, during Marx’s time, with the European ruling class. He also provided an interesting anecdote about his experience with Mao. He said that Mao had felt that the Dalai Lama’s mind was very logical, implying that Buddhist education and training help sharpens the mind. He said he met with Mao several times, and that once, during a meeting in Beijing, the Chinese leader called him in and announced: “Your mind is scientific!” — an assessment that was followed by the famous line, “religion is poison.”

During which he brought up an interesting topic. He states that:

“I look to the politics of hope inaugurated by Yes Magazine for guidance. Because this is bigger now than Democrats vs. Republicans. This is bigger than Rich vs. Poor. This is deeper than just Wall Street vs. Main Street. This is about the worst of Wall Street against the United States of America. It is really about a cheap patriotism vs. a deep patriotism”.

I don’t know what Van Jones keeps calling “this”. The whole speech was not available, so I cannot use it in context. I suppose that “this” refers to the strife in America.  I suppose he is trying to say that these problems that we have in this country (debt, unemployment, no money, inflation…)are not just small squabble anymore. Its big. It’s, in his mind, a battle between a “cheep patriotism and a deep patriotism”. First off, with a guy as liberal as Van Jones,  you can pretty much tell that this “cheap patriotism” is the Tea Party or any other patriot groups like it. He is somehow stating that even though Democrats have run the country into the ground and been against the will of the people every step of the way, somehow the left is more patriotic than we are. Regardless, Van Jones’s stupidity continues…

“This is about a patriotism that would take a wrecking ball; paint it red, white, and blue; and ram it through our communities. And Expect us to stand and solute a cheep patriotism verses a deep patriotism and a deep love of country. That’s what’s at stake now.”

(followed by clapping. Makes me think of Star Wars: III)

So now, Van thinks of the Tea Party as a big wrecking ball painted red, white, and blue that we ram through communities.  And expect liberals, or “us” as he put it, to stand and salute a cheap patriotism? Van Jones is wrong, again. Because, the last time I check we were trying to get the GOVERNMENT’S attention, to get the attention of the government, and make them change their ways. Also, it’s not a wrecking ball headed into communities. I’d like to send one to Washington, but not communities. Plus, if your community was just watching the Tea Party on TV, you can change the channel. He is acting like liberals are powerless to stop us. You know, nothing is perfect. If liberals were so upset about having a wrecking ball rammed through their community, then do something! If your that mad, then liberals, call your 23-year-old son out of the basement and have him vote. Go out and protest our protests. Call your friends and have them vote. It’s not like Americans cannot try to change the government. To put it into a Van Jones like metaphor, if the deep patriots (liberals) really wanted to stop us (the Tea Part), they could have come up to the wrecking ball controls, stop us from ramming the ball into big government, and move the ball back to hitting the Constitution. However, they didn’t. They sat idly by and said, “Oh! Someone help us because we won’t do it ourselves!” They waited for someone to do it for them. Notice the difference. The Tea Party took action. They said stop the spending and the big government. They said, don’t run the country down the tubes. The Tea Party is just a bunch of POed people who said STOP. In the words of Dana Loesch,“It’s just a “classic taxpayer revolt”. While the liberals sit by and said “WAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!”

So our “wrecking ball” is now against this “deep patriotism” and a “deep love of country”. Strange, I thought that a deep patriotism was when you felt true to your founding. So, when someone trying to “progress” forward, you know it’s wrong. Wait, is Van Jones getting patriot and progressive confused? On to the next moronic statement:

“on this side of the political aisle, we don’t tend to brag on our patriotism, but we tend to be quieter about it, but still waters run deep”.

I love how hidden in words the real meaning of what he said is. You have to really look at it and see what it means.  The first thing would be the first phrase, “on this side of the political aisle,” That one’s hard. Democrat. Next: “we don’t tend to brag about our patriotism”. Now, this one bugs me. Yet again, hidden in words. You know he is making a quick stab at the Tea Party, a quick stab at the patrioticness of our people.  Well, in my opinion, that’s your problem. One has the right to show their love for their country. Why do you think America has stayed around so long? Why do you think America has been the land of opportunity? Why are we one of the greatest military forces in the world? Because we’re proud to be Americans. We stick with our country through the good times and bad. We don’t stand idly by as we watch our country fall apart. We embrace our founding and hold strong to it. We have the right to state what we believe and assemble peacefully. We know you stand strong to your roots too, they’re just not ours!

Also, you said that still waters run deep. I don’t get the water thing. As a progressive, shouldn’t you use some new beverage? Like Gatorade or something? not water. I thought you had to progress on from just plain water!

“Paul Ryan’s Budget is a threat to our country”

First, is it not the Democrats who have created a bad situation? Today, as Paul Ryan’s video states, we are faced with uncontrolled government spending, high taxes, and a huge 14 trillion-dollar debt.

Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security growing so big that they will fail (not too big to fail, so big they WILL fail). The government has gotten into the auto industry, the economy, the energy sector and our healthcare. If anything is a threat to our country it is the Democrats and their reckless government spending and expands.

Now, we will be taking a slight detour from Van Jones. In my opinion, in order to explain to you why Van Jones is wrong yet again. We need to take a look at Ryan’s budget:

Even according to CBS news, Paul Ryan’s budget is a good thing. It cuts the deficit by $4.4 trillion over ten years. It repeals the health care bill, reforms  Medicare and Medicaid, makes cuts to defense (endorsed by Defense Secretary Robert Gates), and cuts spending. Now I will explain each of the problems that Paul Ryan’s budget that CBS outlined in their article:

               Health Care:

Repeal it. However CBS refers to the healthcare takeover as “President Obama’s most significant accomplishment, the Affordable Care Act”

               Medicare Reform:

Under Ryan’s plan, seniors would buy private insurance and the government would then pay the private insurer. It also increases help for the sick and poor and shifts more of the cost to wealthy seniors. Liberals (of course) claim that Republicans are cutting benefits for the elderly. When I think of Democrats saying that Republicans kill old people, it makes me think about that old story ” if you give a mouse a cookie”. We gave seniors more and more things. This helped them, and we saw no immediate danger. However, now that we learn that it is going to run out of money and that we need to radically alter it, the Democrats just criticize. They don’t look at facts. I don’t get it.

              Medicaid:

The GOP plan would give a set number of money to the states. This will give governors the ability to give out the Medicaid program, but give money as they see fit. So, the Fed can regulate how much it costs. So, there will be no more throwing money at things. I am sure that in this case Democrats will say we are killing people, too. However, can you really ever make a liberal happy?

             Tax Reform:

Cut them!

            Social Security:

“In the event that the Social Security Program is not sustainable”  the President, House, and Senate would have to all come up with ideas to make sure the program runs smoothly. .

           Energy Subsidies:

The plan counts on money from drilling for oil on and off shore in the United States. (shocking right! Drilling HERE!)

———————————————————-

So, back to Van Jones. He states that Paul Ryan’s plan it is a threat to America. In what I have seen, it helps America more than the liberals have even dreamed of.

I don’t see how it is a threat to America. You know what the biggest threat to America is? liberals! Now, let’s look some more at Mr. Jones.

“Paul Ryan’s budget would knock out more critical infrastructure than al-Qaeda ever dreamed of!”

How dare you! How dare you try to say that a Republican plan would be worse than a terrorist group that murdered hundreds of people! How dare you equate fiscal responsibility with the murderers of al-Qaeda, who on September 11, 2001 launched a horrible, murderous, deliberate attack on America! How is this:

better than Paul Ryan’s plan to save America? And you liberals are trying to equate murders and  Conservatives. Typical. Liberals naming us as senior murdering, woman hating people. We’re not. We’re trying to save this country from you morons. Listen to reason for once in your life. And don’t ever, ever try to equate us with murders. If you want one of those, look at your own stance on Abortion. However, that’s a whole other article.

I think that this statement needs no interpretation. It is so preposterous that you don’t really need to look at it, but we will.

Jones is trying to say that this budget will take out things that the federal government has put into our lives. He is saying that it shrinks back government (to where it should be, that is…) way too far. He is saying that it takes away the Fed’s power too much, knocking out its power supply. Well, they should. The federal government has grown way too much.

But let us not forget he just stated that a GOP budget is worse than al- Qaeda. However, let’s get back to the latest Van Jones failure…

“It is a threat not just to Democrats and to the President, but to what we hold dear, what we have built up as a nation over a hundred years of progress towards the beauty of our founding dream.”

There are so many things wrong with this that I don’t know where to start.

First off, it’s a threat to Democrats because it makes them look like morons because we managed to come out with a smart budget to help and not hurt us. Also, the Democrats don’t like the budget because it goes against liberal rule number one:  spend as much as human or inhumanly possible!

Second, we have built up things for one hundred years? I thought the United States has been around two hundred and thirty-five years. oh wait! I forgot! The Progressive movement was created in 1912 with Theodore Roosevelt. So, Jones is either a moron (well…) or he is stating date of the beginning of the Progressive movement in the United States. So heading from the standpoint that he is talking about Progressivism, in Van Jones’s mind, they are making progress to the FOUNDING dream of progress. Wait. So, even though their group is about moving on, they are moving on and forward to their founding dream? I thought that was going backwards. It makes no sense.

Ok! Now, let’s go from the thought that he really meant to say was “It is a threat…to…what we have built up over TWO hundred years towards the beauty of our founding dream” Well, then it still makes no sense. So, over all our years of keeping and sustaining this country, we have tried to PROGRESS to our founding dream?  Don’t  you either mean progress FROM our founding dream or stay true to the beauty of our founding dream. You cannot progress TOWARDS the  FOUNDING DREAM, but only away from it.Via WIKIPEDIA, Progressivism= ” a political attitude favoring or advocating changes or reform through governmental action. Progressivism is often viewed in opposition to conservative or reactionary ideologies.” Since Conservatism is staying true to the founding principles (via Wikipedia: ” political and social philosophy that promotes the maintenance of traditional institutions and supports, at the most, minimal and gradual change in society” and Progressivism is the opposite of Conservatism, then is it not true that progressives try to go away from their founding, not build up to it? Van Jones doesn’t really know his stuff….

Nevertheless, Van Jones’s statement is rude, stupid, and offensive to all Conservatives. Any patriot out there who understands the bare minimum of the word American, please wake up your liberal friends. Please show them the error of their ways. It starts little. I’m doing my part. How about you?